P&Z Meeting comments

Print More

I am writing to clarify / elaborate on my public comments as written in the P&Z meeting highlights from April 12 in the May issue.

My public comment reflected my opinion only and not necessarily the opinion of my wife, Gaylien Chun. Since we share the same email account and the comments were submitted via email, we completely understand the confusion. My full comment was that I was in support of a cannabis establishment subject to the same rules and regulations as the town package / liquor stores. Thank you.

Matthew Hamer