The First Amendment was enacted to assure the freedom of conscience in speech, religion and assembly without coercion by government. However, we’ve forgotten the moral religious underpinnings of the Amendment, living in a day where all sides are trying to silence the other’s free speech with who can “shout” and “profile” the loudest for their cause.
Meanwhile, our town leadership, educators and library staff are trying to keep the peace in navigating this mine field. First Selectman Mark Fiorentino repeatedly says, “We can agree to disagree,” to bring sides together to discuss and resolve issues. I further applaud Granby’s facilities’ use policy that permits use regardless of belief.
The amendment brings challenges for Granby. Recent abuse of the right to home school in Waterbury has sparked criticism, but isolated incidents shouldn’t diminish collective rights. Also, a recent Supreme Court ruling requires religious opt-outs of lessons in public schools. This right to opt out of certain educational content will require more two-way collaborative communication going forward.
Another example is the apprehension for Bible education or religious history programs due to potential criticism. The content of programs I’ve conducted has been to review the history of what the Bible says with application being a personal choice. My experience in the last five years has been nothing but healthy social camaraderie and learning, relieving the fears.
The worst thing is to silence the other side to maintain the peace. This is not a new tension, but it has become an obsession because of the potential for moral issues at stake. Silence is not golden as it results in blind spots in the moral and religious education of Granby’s adults and children in the issues of our day.
Editor’s note: Skip (Walter) Mission, a lifelong Granby resident, has taught Bible classes in Granby and elsewhere for several years at various venues.