As Connecticut takes bold steps forward on environmental policy, not all legislators are moving with the same urgency. Granby and its surrounding communities deserve a representative committed to safeguarding our air, water, land and the health of future generations. Yet this year’s Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV) Environmental Scorecard tells a sobering story. State Representative Mark Anderson (R-62nd) earned one of the lowest scores in the state, with only 39 percent support for pro-environment policies in the 2025 session.
What does the scorecard measure?
For 25 years, the CTLCV Scorecard has graded legislators—Democrats and Republicans alike—on their votes related to Connecticut’s climate, energy, conservation, wildlife and public health. This year, the league scored more than 20 major bills, including landmark legislation to address climate change (HB 5004), climate resiliency (SB 9), energy affordability, invasive species management, reduction of toxic chemicals and land preservation.
Anderson voted against the environmental position on a majority of major bills—an overall record at stark odds with the pro-environment stance that a growing majority of Connecticut residents demand.
Breaking down the record
When the 2025 session called for action on pressing environmental issues, Anderson’s votes lagged behind:
Climate Action: Voted against HB 5004, which sets a net-zero carbon emissions goal for 2050 and provides incentives for clean energy jobs.
Pollution and Waste: Opposed or neglected to support measures for managing food waste and reducing plastics, critical as Connecticut faces a growing waste crisis.
Land, Water and Wildlife: Missed opportunities to support new state water plan updates, riparian area protection, and invasive species control.
Public Health: Showed little support for bills aiming to restrict harmful chemicals like PFAS in consumer products and to protect pollinators by banning dangerous pesticides.
The environment matters for Granby
Granby is defined by its farmland, forests and small-town heritage. Unchecked pollution, climate shifts or weakened conservation protections pose real threats—to property values, public health and Granby’s rural character. As Connecticut leads on these issues, Granby’s environmental voice in Hartford must be stronger, not weaker.
Protecting natural resources is not a partisan issue—it’s a promise to the next generation. Connecticut’s best local leaders, regardless of party, put the environment and public health at the heart of their service. With a 39 percent score, Rep. Anderson falls short—not just compared to environmental champions in Hartford and beyond, but to the needs of the people he serves.
Climate change, toxic pollution, and loss of green space are not waiting for politics to catch up. Granby and area residents deserve a representative ready to find common ground and embrace solutions that will sustain both the economy and environment. As the next election approaches, voters have a clear choice: demand better, and hold leaders accountable for their environmental records.